- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- Roadmachine X TWO vs SuperSix EVO 4
BMC Roadmachine X TWO vs Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4
En qué gana Roadmachine X TWO (0) y dónde se impone SuperSix EVO 4 (0) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
5,7Componentes6,0
Geometría del cuadro
Comparativa de geometría
Roadmachine X TWOSuperSix EVO 4
Geometría del fabricante por talla, en mm y grados. Stack y reach describen la posición: más stack — más erguida, más reach — más estirada.
Roadmachine X TWO
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | 525 | 370 | 520 | 414 | 71,4° | 74,2° | 982 | 415 | 75 | 726 |
| 51 | 550 | 379 | 537 | 461 | 71,4° | 74,2° | 1.000 | 415 | 75 | 762 |
| 54 | 570 | 383 | 546 | 488 | 72,2° | 74,2° | 997 | 415 | 75 | 786 |
| 56 | 595 | 388 | 559 | 508 | 72,2° | 74,2° | 1.010 | 415 | 75 | 807 |
| 58 | 620 | 393 | 571 | 529 | 72,2° | 74,2° | 1.023 | 415 | 75 | 828 |
| 61 | 645 | 398 | 581 | 550 | 72,2° | 74,2° | 1.036 | 415 | 75 | 849 |
SuperSix EVO 4
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 495 | 373 | 510 | 400 | 70,9° | 74,5° | 980 | 410 | 74 | 694 |
| 48 | 508 | 376 | 522 | 429 | 71,2° | 74° | 985 | 410 | 74 | 717 |
| 50 | 520 | 379 | 529 | 448 | 71,2° | 74° | 993 | 410 | 74 | 733 |
| 52 | 532 | 383 | 536 | 467 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.002 | 410 | 72 | 752 |
| 54 | 545 | 387 | 544 | 490 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.010 | 410 | 72 | 770 |
| 56 | 565 | 393 | 560 | 510 | 73° | 73,5° | 995 | 410 | 72 | 790 |
| 58 | 585 | 398 | 577 | 532 | 73° | 73° | 1.007 | 410 | 69 | 812 |
| 61 | 615 | 406 | 600 | 570 | 73° | 72,5° | 1.024 | 410 | 69 | 846 |
¿Por qué Roadmachine X TWO es mejor que SuperSix EVO 4?
Roadmachine X TWO no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
¿Por qué SuperSix EVO 4 es mejor que Roadmachine X TWO?
SuperSix EVO 4 no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | Roadmachine X Carbon with Tuned Compliance Concept Endurance, Fender Mounts, Stealth Dropout Design, Flat Mount Disc, 12x142mm Thru-Axle | SuperSix EVO Carbon, Gen 5, integrated cable routing, 12x142 thru-axle, BSA 68mm threaded BB, flat mount disc, integrated seat binder, UDH |
| Peso | 8,8 kg | — |
| Peso máximo total | 110 kg | — |
| Tallas | 47, 51, 54, 56, 58, 61 | 44, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61 |
| Colores | — | Cactus Green, Raw |
| Año del modelo | 2024 | 2026 |
| Uso | Ruta endurance | Ruta competición |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Rígida | Rígida |
| Horquilla | Roadmachine X Carbon with Tuned Compliance Concept Endurance, Fender Mounts, Stealth Dropout Design, Flat Mount Disc, 12 x 100mm Thru-Axle | SuperSix EVO Carbon, Gen 5, integrated crown race, 12x100mm thru-axle, flat mount disc, internal routing, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4" Delta steerer, 55mm offset (44-54cm), 45mm offset (56-61cm) |
| Tija telescópica | No | No |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | Rival XPLR AXS | Rival AXS |
| Marca del grupo | SRAM | SRAM |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | Sí |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 12 |
| Platos | 1 | 2 |
| Rango del casete | — | 10–36T |
| Desviador trasero | SRAM Rival XPLR eTap AXS | SRAM Rival AXS, 12-speed |
| Mandos de cambio | SRAM Rival eTap AXS | SRAM Rival AXS, 2x12-speed |
| Casete | SRAM Rival AXS XPLR (XG-1251) | SRAM Rival XG-1250, 10-36, 12-speed |
| Bielas | SRAM Rival 1 DUB WIDE | SRAM Rival AXS, 48/35: 165mm (44-50cm), 170mm (52-56cm), 172.5 (58-61cm) |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | Disco hidráulico |
| Frenos | — | SRAM Rival AXS hydraulic disc, 160/160mm PaceLine centerlock |
| Disco delantero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Disco trasero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | WTB Byway, Distance+ Compound, TCS Light bead, Tubeless Ready, 34mm | Schwalbe One TLR, 700x28c, tubeless ready (note: some bikes may ship with 30c tires due to regional availability) |
| Ancho de llanta | 34 mm | 28 mm |
| Ruedas | XRD-522, Tubeless Ready, 25 mm | DT Swiss ERC LOG 45, carbon, 22mm inner width, 45mm depth, 24h, tubeless ready |
| Rines | — | Carbono |
| Tubeless ready | Sí | Sí |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Tija | Roadmachine 01 X Premium Carbon D-Shaped Seatpost, 15mm Offset, D-Fender Compatible | Cannondale C1 Aero 40 Carbon V2, 365mm, 0mm offset (44-54cm), 15mm offset (56-61cm) |
| Sillín | Fizik Terra Argo X5, 150mm | Fizik Vento Antares R7, 140mm |
| Manubrio | BMC RAB 02, Ergo Top Shape, Compact Bend | Vision Trimax Carbon Aero: 380mm (44-56), 400mm (58-61) |
| Potencia | ICS MTT x Redshift Suspension Stem, Integrated Cockpit System Technology | Cannondale C1 Conceal, Alloy, 31.8, -6°: 80mm (44cm), 90mm (48-52cm), 100mm (54-56cm), 110mm (58-61cm) |
Comparativas relacionadas
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsSpecialized Tarmac Sl8 Expert Ultegra Di2
vs
Cube Agree C:62 SLTvsCannondale SuperSix EVO 4
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsScott Addict Rc 10 Ultegra Di2 R8150 Sunbeam
vs
Giant Defy Advanced Pro Ultegra Di2 MarianavsCannondale SuperSix EVO 4
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsScott Addict Rc 10 Ultegra Di2 R8150 Gelato
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsSpecialized Aethos Expert Di2 Carbon