- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- Teammachine SLR 01 TWO vs SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL
BMC Teammachine SLR 01 TWO vs Cannondale SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL
En qué gana Teammachine SLR 01 TWO (0) y dónde se impone SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL (0) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
9,3Componentes9,1
Geometría del cuadro
Comparativa de geometría
Teammachine SLR 01 TWOSuperSix EVO LAB71 SL
Geometría del fabricante por talla, en mm y grados. Stack y reach describen la posición: más stack — más erguida, más reach — más estirada.
Teammachine SLR 01 TWO
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | 506 | 367 | 515 | 422 | 71,5° | 74° | 968 | 410 | 69 | 717 |
| 51 | 530 | 377 | 532 | 464 | 71,5° | 74° | 986 | 410 | 69 | 752 |
| 54 | 550 | 386 | 552 | 491 | 72,3° | 73,5° | 989 | 410 | 69 | 779 |
| 56 | 565 | 392 | 562 | 509 | 72,3° | 73,5° | 1.000 | 410 | 69 | 797 |
| 58 | 584 | 401 | 582 | 530 | 72,3° | 73° | 1.015 | 410 | 69 | 817 |
| 61 | 608 | 409 | 598 | 555 | 72,3° | 73° | 1.030 | 410 | 69 | 843 |
SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 495 | 373 | 510 | 400 | 70,9° | 74,5° | 980 | 410 | 74 | 694 |
| 48 | 508 | 376 | 522 | 429 | 71,2° | 74° | 985 | 410 | 74 | 717 |
| 50 | 520 | 379 | 529 | 448 | 71,2° | 74° | 993 | 410 | 74 | 733 |
| 52 | 532 | 383 | 536 | 467 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.002 | 410 | 72 | 752 |
| 54 | 545 | 387 | 544 | 490 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.010 | 410 | 72 | 770 |
| 56 | 565 | 393 | 560 | 510 | 73° | 73,5° | 995 | 410 | 72 | 790 |
| 58 | 585 | 398 | 577 | 532 | 73° | 73° | 1.007 | 410 | 69 | 812 |
| 61 | 615 | 406 | 600 | 570 | 73° | 72,5° | 1.024 | 410 | 69 | 846 |
¿Por qué Teammachine SLR 01 TWO es mejor que SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL?
Teammachine SLR 01 TWO no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
¿Por qué SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL es mejor que Teammachine SLR 01 TWO?
SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | Teammachine SLR 01 Gen 5, 01 Premium Carbon with Aerocore Design, ICS Technology Stealth Cable Routing, Full Mount - UDH, TCC Race Compliance Level, Flat Mount Disc, 12 x 142mm Thru-Axle | LAB71 SuperSix EVO, Gen 5, Ultralight Series 0 Carbon, 12x142 thru-axle, BSA 68mm threaded BB, flat mount disc, integrated seat binder, UDH |
| Peso | 6,5 kg | — |
| Peso máximo total | 110 kg | — |
| Tallas | 47, 51, 54, 56, 58, 61 | 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61 |
| Colores | Red | Raw |
| Año del modelo | 2027 | 2026 |
| Uso | Ruta competición | Ruta competición |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Rígida | Rígida |
| Horquilla | Teammachine SLR 01 Gen 5, 01 Premium Carbon, ICS Technology Stealth Cable Routing, TCC Race Compliance Level, Stealth Dropout Design, Flat Mount Disc, 12 x 100mm Thru-Axle, 48mm offset Size 47-51 43mm | LAB71 SuperSix EVO, Gen 5, Ultralight Series 0 Carbon, integrated crown race, 12x100mm thru-axle, flat mount disc, internal routing, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4" Delta steerer, 55mm offset (44-54cm), 45mm offset |
| Tija telescópica | No | No |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | Dura-Ace Di2 | Red AXS |
| Marca del grupo | Shimano | SRAM |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | Sí |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 12 |
| Platos | 2 | 2 |
| Rango del casete | — | 10–30T |
| Desviador trasero | SHIMANO Dura Ace Di2 (RD-R9250) | SRAM RED AXS, 12-speed |
| Mandos de cambio | SHIMANO Dura Ace Di2 (ST-R9270) | SRAM RED AXS, 2x12-speed |
| Casete | SHIMANO Dura Ace (CS-R9200) | SRAM RED XG-1290, 10-30, 12-speed |
| Bielas | SHIMANO Dura Ace (FC-R9200) | SRAM RED AXS Power Meter, 48/35: 165mm (44-50cm), 170mm (52-56cm), 172.5 (58-61cm) |
| Potenciómetro | — | Sí |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | Disco hidráulico |
| Frenos | — | SRAM RED AXS hydraulic disc, Paceline X 160/160mm |
| Disco delantero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Disco trasero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | Pirelli P Zero Race RS, Tube type, 28mm | Vittoria Corsa Pro, 700x28c Tube Type, TPU tube optimized |
| Ancho de llanta | 28 mm | 28 mm |
| Ruedas | DT Swiss ARC 1100 DICUT, 38mm | DT Swiss ARC 1100 DICUT DB 38, carbon, 20mm inner width, 38mm depth |
| Rines | — | Carbono |
| Tubeless ready | Sí | — |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Tija | Teammachine SLR 01 Gen 5, 01 Premium Carbon Aero Shaped Seatpost, 0mm Offset Size 47-51 and 10mm Offset Size 54-61 | Cannondale C1 Aero 40 Carbon V2, Ti Hardware, 365mm, 0mm offset (44-54cm), 15mm offset (56-61cm) |
| Sillín | Fizik Vento Argo R1 Lite, Carbon rail, 140mm | Fizik Vento Antares 00, carbon shell and rails, 140mm |
| Manubrio | ICS Carbon Aero Gen 2, One-Piece Full Carbon Cockpit, 135mm drop, 81mm reach, 12° flare | Cannondale SystemBar Road SL, ultralight, full carbon integrated bar/stem: 90x380mm (44-52cm), 100x380mm (54-56cm), 110x380mm (58cm), 110x40 |
| Potencia | — | Cannondale SystemBar Road SL, ultralight, full carbon integrated bar/stem |
