- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- SuperSix EVO 4 vs Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4 vs Trek Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt
En qué gana SuperSix EVO 4 (0) y dónde se impone Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt (0) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
Trek · 2026Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt
4,2Puntuación
Mayor puntuación 0 ventajas≈ 5.600 USD
6,0Componentes5,7
Geometría del cuadro
Comparativa de geometría
SuperSix EVO 4Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt
Geometría del fabricante por talla, en mm y grados. Stack y reach describen la posición: más stack — más erguida, más reach — más estirada.
SuperSix EVO 4
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 495 | 373 | 510 | 400 | 70,9° | 74,5° | 980 | 410 | 74 | 694 |
| 48 | 508 | 376 | 522 | 429 | 71,2° | 74° | 985 | 410 | 74 | 717 |
| 50 | 520 | 379 | 529 | 448 | 71,2° | 74° | 993 | 410 | 74 | 733 |
| 52 | 532 | 383 | 536 | 467 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.002 | 410 | 72 | 752 |
| 54 | 545 | 387 | 544 | 490 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.010 | 410 | 72 | 770 |
| 56 | 565 | 393 | 560 | 510 | 73° | 73,5° | 995 | 410 | 72 | 790 |
| 58 | 585 | 398 | 577 | 532 | 73° | 73° | 1.007 | 410 | 69 | 812 |
| 61 | 615 | 406 | 600 | 570 | 73° | 72,5° | 1.024 | 410 | 69 | 846 |
Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XS | 535 | 380 | 536 | 445 | 71° | 72,7° | 1.023 | 440 | 76 | 746 |
| S | 556 | 386 | 547 | 480 | 71,4° | 73° | 1.032 | 440 | 76 | 772 |
| M | 579 | 391 | 566 | 505 | 71,6° | 72,8° | 1.044 | 440 | 76 | 799 |
| ML | 601 | 397 | 578 | 530 | 72° | 72,8° | 1.052 | 440 | 76 | 813 |
| L | 620 | 402 | 589 | 550 | 72,1° | 72,8° | 1.063 | 440 | 76 | 837 |
| XL | 640 | 408 | 601 | 575 | 72,4° | 72,8° | 1.072 | 440 | 76 | 861 |
¿Por qué SuperSix EVO 4 es mejor que Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt?
SuperSix EVO 4 no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
¿Por qué Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt es mejor que SuperSix EVO 4?
Checkpoint+ SL 6 AXS Fjord Blue/Cobalt no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | SuperSix EVO Carbon, Gen 5, integrated cable routing, 12x142 thru-axle, BSA 68mm threaded BB, flat mount disc, integrated seat binder, UDH | Carbon |
| Peso | — | 13,8 kg |
| Peso máximo total | — | 125 kg |
| Tallas | 44, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61 | XS, S, M, ML, L, XL |
| Colores | Cactus Green, Raw | Fjord Blue/Cobalt Blue, Matte Bronze Age/Dark Web |
| Año del modelo | 2026 | 2026 |
| Uso | Ruta competición | Ruta competición |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Rígida | Rígida |
| Horquilla | SuperSix EVO Carbon, Gen 5, integrated crown race, 12x100mm thru-axle, flat mount disc, internal routing, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4" Delta steerer, 55mm offset (44-54cm), 45mm offset (56-61cm) | Checkpoint full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, fender mounts, triple rack mounts, flat mount disc, 12x100mm chamfered thru axle |
| Tija telescópica | No | No |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | Rival AXS | GX Eagle AXS |
| Marca del grupo | SRAM | SRAM |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | Sí |
| Sistema de cambios | — | Desviador |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 12 |
| Platos | 2 | — |
| Rango del casete | 10–36T | 10–52T |
| Desviador trasero | SRAM Rival AXS, 12-speed | SRAM GX AXS |
| Mandos de cambio | SRAM Rival AXS, 2x12-speed | SRAM Rival AXS E1 |
| Casete | SRAM Rival XG-1250, 10-36, 12-speed | SRAM Eagle XS-1275, T-Type, 10-52, 12 speed |
| Bielas | SRAM Rival AXS, 48/35: 165mm (44-50cm), 170mm (52-56cm), 172.5 (58-61cm) | Praxis Alloy, 170mm length |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | Disco hidráulico |
| Frenos | SRAM Rival AXS hydraulic disc, 160/160mm PaceLine centerlock | hydraulic disc |
| Disco delantero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Disco trasero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | Schwalbe One TLR, 700x28c, tubeless ready (note: some bikes may ship with 30c tires due to regional availability) | Bontrager Girona Pro, Tubeless Ready, GR puncture protection, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 700x42mm |
| Ancho de llanta | 28 mm | — |
| Ruedas | DT Swiss ERC LOG 45, carbon, 22mm inner width, 45mm depth, 24h, tubeless ready | Bontrager Paradigm Comp 25, Tubeless Ready, 25mm rim width, 100x12mm thru axle |
| Rines | Carbono | — |
| Tubeless ready | Sí | Sí |
| Sistema eléctrico | ||
| Marca del motor | — | TQ |
| Motor | — | TQ-HPR60, 60 Nm, 250 watt maximum continuous rated power, 350 watt peak power |
| Posición del motor | — | Motor central |
| Torque del motor | — | 60 Nm |
| Potencia máxima | — | 250 W |
| Capacidad de batería | — | 360 Wh |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Tija | Cannondale C1 Aero 40 Carbon V2, 365mm, 0mm offset (44-54cm), 15mm offset (56-61cm) | Bontrager carbon, 27.2mm, 8mm offset, 330mm length |
| Sillín | Fizik Vento Antares R7, 140mm | Verse Short Comp, steel rails, 145mm width |
| Manubrio | Vision Trimax Carbon Aero: 380mm (44-56), 400mm (58-61) | Bontrager Elite Gravel, alloy, 42cm width |
| Potencia | Cannondale C1 Conceal, Alloy, 31.8, -6°: 80mm (44cm), 90mm (48-52cm), 100mm (54-56cm), 110mm (58-61cm) | Bontrager Pro, 31.8mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree, 80mm length |
Comparativas relacionadas
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsSpecialized Tarmac Sl8 Expert Ultegra Di2
vs
Cube Agree C:62 SLTvsCannondale SuperSix EVO 4
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsScott Addict Rc 10 Ultegra Di2 R8150 Sunbeam
vs
Giant Defy Advanced Pro Ultegra Di2 MarianavsCannondale SuperSix EVO 4
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsOrbea Orca Aero M21eltd Force Axs 12s Carbon Raw
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsScott Foil Rc Tri Force Axs Cumulus