- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- SuperSix EVO 4 vs Domane SL 7 Gen 4
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4 vs Trek Domane SL 7 Gen 4
En qué gana SuperSix EVO 4 (0) y dónde se impone Domane SL 7 Gen 4 (1) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
6,0Componentes7,2
Geometría del cuadro
Comparativa de geometría
SuperSix EVO 4Domane SL 7 Gen 4
Geometría del fabricante por talla, en mm y grados. Stack y reach describen la posición: más stack — más erguida, más reach — más estirada.
SuperSix EVO 4
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 495 | 373 | 510 | 400 | 70,9° | 74,5° | 980 | 410 | 74 | 694 |
| 48 | 508 | 376 | 522 | 429 | 71,2° | 74° | 985 | 410 | 74 | 717 |
| 50 | 520 | 379 | 529 | 448 | 71,2° | 74° | 993 | 410 | 74 | 733 |
| 52 | 532 | 383 | 536 | 467 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.002 | 410 | 72 | 752 |
| 54 | 545 | 387 | 544 | 490 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.010 | 410 | 72 | 770 |
| 56 | 565 | 393 | 560 | 510 | 73° | 73,5° | 995 | 410 | 72 | 790 |
| 58 | 585 | 398 | 577 | 532 | 73° | 73° | 1.007 | 410 | 69 | 812 |
| 61 | 615 | 406 | 600 | 570 | 73° | 72,5° | 1.024 | 410 | 69 | 846 |
Domane SL 7 Gen 4
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47cm | 527 | 364 | 509 | 420 | 71° | 74,6° | 986 | 420 | 80 | 686 |
| 50cm | 546 | 368 | 519 | 450 | 71,1° | 74,6° | 996 | 420 | 80 | 716 |
| 52cm | 561 | 371 | 530 | 475 | 71,3° | 74,2° | 1.003 | 420 | 80 | 735 |
| 54cm | 575 | 374 | 542 | 500 | 71,3° | 73,7° | 1.010 | 420 | 80 | 754 |
| 56cm | 591 | 377 | 554 | 525 | 71,9° | 73,3° | 1.008 | 420 | 78 | 776 |
| 58cm | 611 | 380 | 567 | 548 | 72° | 73° | 1.022 | 425 | 78 | 796 |
| 60cm | 632 | 383 | 579 | 567 | 72,1° | 72,8° | 1.032 | 425 | 75 | 817 |
| 62cm | 656 | 386 | 593 | 586 | 72,1° | 72,5° | 1.042 | 425 | 75 | 835 |
¿Por qué SuperSix EVO 4 es mejor que Domane SL 7 Gen 4?
SuperSix EVO 4 no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
¿Por qué Domane SL 7 Gen 4 es mejor que SuperSix EVO 4?
- Gama del grupo (1–5)3/5 vs 4/5+33 %
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | SuperSix EVO Carbon, Gen 5, integrated cable routing, 12x142 thru-axle, BSA 68mm threaded BB, flat mount disc, integrated seat binder, UDH | 500 Series OCLV Carbon, IsoSpeed, internal storage, tapered head tube, internal cable routing, 3S chain keeper, fender mounts, flat mount disc, 142x12mm thru axle |
| Peso | — | 8,4 kg |
| Peso máximo total | — | 125 kg |
| Tallas | 44, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61 | 47cm, 50cm, 52cm, 54cm, 56cm, 58cm, 60cm, 62cm |
| Colores | Cactus Green, Raw | Matte Lunar Silver |
| Año del modelo | 2026 | 2026 |
| Uso | Ruta competición | Ruta endurance |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Rígida | Rígida |
| Horquilla | SuperSix EVO Carbon, Gen 5, integrated crown race, 12x100mm thru-axle, flat mount disc, internal routing, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4" Delta steerer, 55mm offset (44-54cm), 45mm offset (56-61cm) | Domane SL carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, fender mounts, flat mount disc, 12x100mm thru axle |
| Tija telescópica | No | No |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | Rival AXS | Ultegra Di2 |
| Marca del grupo | SRAM | Shimano |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | Sí |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 12 |
| Platos | 2 | 2 |
| Rango del casete | 10–36T | 11–34T |
| Desviador trasero | SRAM Rival AXS, 12-speed | Shimano Ultegra R8150 Di2, 34T max cog |
| Mandos de cambio | SRAM Rival AXS, 2x12-speed | Shimano Ultegra R8170 Di2, 12 speed |
| Casete | SRAM Rival XG-1250, 10-36, 12-speed | Shimano Ultegra R8101, 11-34, 12 speed |
| Bielas | SRAM Rival AXS, 48/35: 165mm (44-50cm), 170mm (52-56cm), 172.5 (58-61cm) | Shimano Ultegra R8100, 50/34, 170mm length |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | Disco hidráulico |
| Frenos | SRAM Rival AXS hydraulic disc, 160/160mm PaceLine centerlock | Shimano Ultegra hydraulic disc, flat mount |
| Disco delantero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Disco trasero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | Schwalbe One TLR, 700x28c, tubeless ready (note: some bikes may ship with 30c tires due to regional availability) | Bontrager Kwaremont Pro TLR, tubeless ready, folding bead, Race Dual-Compound, 120 tpi, 700x32mm |
| Ancho de llanta | 28 mm | — |
| Ruedas | DT Swiss ERC LOG 45, carbon, 22mm inner width, 45mm depth, 24h, tubeless ready | Bontrager Aeolus Pro 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 100x12mm thru axle |
| Rines | Carbono | Carbono |
| Tubeless ready | Sí | Sí |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Tija | Cannondale C1 Aero 40 Carbon V2, 365mm, 0mm offset (44-54cm), 15mm offset (56-61cm) | KVF aero carbon seatpost, 20mm offset, 280mm length |
| Sillín | Fizik Vento Antares R7, 140mm | Verse Short Comp, steel rails, 145mm width |
| Manubrio | Vision Trimax Carbon Aero: 380mm (44-56), 400mm (58-61) | Bontrager Comp, alloy, 31.8mm, 80mm reach, 121mm drop, 40cm control width, 44cm drop width |
| Potencia | Cannondale C1 Conceal, Alloy, 31.8, -6°: 80mm (44cm), 90mm (48-52cm), 100mm (54-56cm), 110mm (58-61cm) | Trek RCS Pro, -7 degree, 100mm length |
Comparativas relacionadas
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsSpecialized Tarmac Sl8 Expert Ultegra Di2
vs
Cube Agree C:62 SLTvsCannondale SuperSix EVO 4
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsScott Addict Rc 10 Ultegra Di2 R8150 Sunbeam
vs
Giant Defy Advanced Pro Ultegra Di2 MarianavsCannondale SuperSix EVO 4
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsOrbea Orca Aero M21eltd Force Axs 12s Carbon Raw
vs
Cannondale SuperSix EVO 4vsScott Foil Rc Tri Force Axs Cumulus