- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL vs Avail Advanced Pro 0
Cannondale SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL vs Liv Avail Advanced Pro 0
En qué gana SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL (1) y dónde se impone Avail Advanced Pro 0 (0) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
9,1Componentes6,5
Geometría del cuadro
Comparativa de geometría
SuperSix EVO LAB71 SLAvail Advanced Pro 0
Geometría del fabricante por talla, en mm y grados. Stack y reach describen la posición: más stack — más erguida, más reach — más estirada.
SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 495 | 373 | 510 | 400 | 70,9° | 74,5° | 980 | 410 | 74 | 694 |
| 48 | 508 | 376 | 522 | 429 | 71,2° | 74° | 985 | 410 | 74 | 717 |
| 50 | 520 | 379 | 529 | 448 | 71,2° | 74° | 993 | 410 | 74 | 733 |
| 52 | 532 | 383 | 536 | 467 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.002 | 410 | 72 | 752 |
| 54 | 545 | 387 | 544 | 490 | 71,2° | 74° | 1.010 | 410 | 72 | 770 |
| 56 | 565 | 393 | 560 | 510 | 73° | 73,5° | 995 | 410 | 72 | 790 |
| 58 | 585 | 398 | 577 | 532 | 73° | 73° | 1.007 | 410 | 69 | 812 |
| 61 | 615 | 406 | 600 | 570 | 73° | 72,5° | 1.024 | 410 | 69 | 846 |
Avail Advanced Pro 0
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XXS | 510 | 363 | 500 | 385 | 69,8° | 75° | 989 | 420 | 75 | 683 |
| XS | 528 | 373 | 520 | 405 | 71° | 74,5° | 995 | 420 | 75 | 712 |
| S | 547 | 373 | 525 | 435 | 71° | 74,5° | 1.002 | 420 | 75 | 737 |
| M | 566 | 373 | 535 | 465 | 71° | 74° | 1.007 | 420 | 75 | 762 |
| L | 589 | 381 | 550 | 495 | 72° | 74° | 1.013 | 420 | 75 | 789 |
¿Por qué SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL es mejor que Avail Advanced Pro 0?
- Gama del grupo (1–5)5/5 vs 4/5+25 %
¿Por qué Avail Advanced Pro 0 es mejor que SuperSix EVO LAB71 SL?
Avail Advanced Pro 0 no tiene ventajas medibles en este duelo.
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | LAB71 SuperSix EVO, Gen 5, Ultralight Series 0 Carbon, 12x142 thru-axle, BSA 68mm threaded BB, flat mount disc, integrated seat binder, UDH | Advanced-grade composite, 12x142mm thru-axle, disc |
| Tallas | 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61 | XXS, XS, S, M, L |
| Colores | Raw | Dreamy Blue/Carbon/Chrome |
| Año del modelo | 2026 | 2026 |
| Uso | Ruta competición | Ruta endurance |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Rígida | Rígida |
| Horquilla | LAB71 SuperSix EVO, Gen 5, Ultralight Series 0 Carbon, integrated crown race, 12x100mm thru-axle, flat mount disc, internal routing, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4" Delta steerer, 55mm offset (44-54cm), 45mm offset | Advanced SL-grade Composite, full-composite OverDrive Aero steerer, 12x100mm thru-axle, disc |
| Tija telescópica | No | No |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | Red AXS | Ultegra Di2 |
| Marca del grupo | SRAM | Shimano |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | Sí |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 12 |
| Platos | 2 | 2 |
| Rango del casete | 10–30T | 11–34T |
| Desviador trasero | SRAM RED AXS, 12-speed | Shimano Ultegra Di2 RD-R8150 |
| Mandos de cambio | SRAM RED AXS, 2x12-speed | Shimano Ultegra Di2 ST-R8170 |
| Casete | SRAM RED XG-1290, 10-30, 12-speed | Shimano Ultegra, 12-speed, 11x34 |
| Bielas | SRAM RED AXS Power Meter, 48/35: 165mm (44-50cm), 170mm (52-56cm), 172.5 (58-61cm) | Shimano Ultegra, 34/50 with Giant power meter, XXS:160mm, XS:165mm, S:165mm, M:170mm, L:172.5mm |
| Potenciómetro | Sí | Sí |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | Disco hidráulico |
| Frenos | SRAM RED AXS hydraulic disc, Paceline X 160/160mm | Shimano Ultegra hydraulic, Shimano RT-CL800 |
| Disco delantero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Disco trasero | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | Vittoria Corsa Pro, 700x28c Tube Type, TPU tube optimized | CADEX Classic 32, tubeless, 700x32c, folding |
| Ancho de llanta | 28 mm | 32 mm |
| Ruedas | DT Swiss ARC 1100 DICUT DB 38, carbon, 20mm inner width, 38mm depth | Giant SLR 0 40 WheelSystem, [F] 36mm, [R] 36mm |
| Rines | Carbono | — |
| Tubeless ready | — | Sí |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Tija | Cannondale C1 Aero 40 Carbon V2, Ti Hardware, 365mm, 0mm offset (44-54cm), 15mm offset (56-61cm) | Giant D-Fuse SLR, composite, -5/+15mm offset, XXS: 350mm, XS: 350mm, S: 350mm, M: 350mm, L: 350mm |
| Sillín | Fizik Vento Antares 00, carbon shell and rails, 140mm | Liv Alacra SL |
| Manubrio | Cannondale SystemBar Road SL, ultralight, full carbon integrated bar/stem: 90x380mm (44-52cm), 100x380mm (54-56cm), 110x380mm (58cm), 110x40 | Liv Contact SLR D-Fuse, 31.8mm, XXS: 380mm, XS: 380mm, S: 400mm, M: 400mm, L: 420mm |
| Potencia | Cannondale SystemBar Road SL, ultralight, full carbon integrated bar/stem | Giant Contact SL AeroLight, XXS: 70mm, XS: 70mm, S: 80mm, M: 90mm, L: 90mm |
Comparativas relacionadas
vs
Trek Checkpoint ALR 3vsLiv Avail Advanced Pro 0
vs
Bulls Daily Grinder 3vsLiv Avail Advanced Pro 0
vs
Giant Revolt 0vsLiv Avail Advanced Pro 0
vs
Lapierre Crosshill AL 2.0vsLiv Avail Advanced Pro 0
vs
Giant Defy Advanced 3vsLiv Avail Advanced Pro 0
vs
r-raymon Territ CompvsLiv Avail Advanced Pro 0