- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400X vs Domane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5
Cube Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400X vs Trek Domane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5
En qué gana Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400X (3) y dónde se impone Domane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5 (3) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
6,8Marco y peso9,4
8,1Componentes9,5
8,1Sistema eléctrico3,4
Geometría del cuadro
Comparativa de geometría
Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400XDomane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5
Geometría del fabricante por talla, en mm y grados. Stack y reach describen la posición: más stack — más erguida, más reach — más estirada.
Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400X
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XS | 524 | 387 | 522 | 430 | 69,5° | 75,5° | 1.053 | 453 | 70 | — |
| S | 544 | 388 | 537 | 460 | 70,5° | 74,7° | 1.052 | 453 | 70 | — |
| M | 579 | 393 | 560 | 490 | 71,5° | 73,9° | 1.059 | 453 | 70 | — |
| L | 599 | 392 | 575 | 510 | 72° | 73° | 1.060 | 453 | 70 | — |
| XL | 623 | 402 | 592 | 540 | 72,5° | 73° | 1.072 | 453 | 70 | — |
Domane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5
| Talla | Stack | Reach | Tubo superior | Tubo de sillín | Ángulo de dirección | Ángulo de sillín | Distancia entre ejes | Vainas | Caída del pedalier | Altura libre |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XS | 524 | 368 | 520 | 444 | 71,3° | 73,5° | 997 | 430 | 80 | 715 |
| S | 555 | 371 | 530 | 476 | 71,1° | 73,7° | 1.012 | 430 | 80 | 749 |
| M | 575 | 374 | 541 | 500 | 71,2° | 73,5° | 1.021 | 430 | 80 | 776 |
| ML | 596 | 377 | 553 | 533 | 71,9° | 73,3° | 1.020 | 430 | 78 | 809 |
| L | 618 | 380 | 562 | 553 | 72° | 73,3° | 1.029 | 430 | 78 | 832 |
| XL | 648 | 384 | 575 | 593 | 72,1° | 73,3° | 1.043 | 430 | 75 | 869 |
¿Por qué Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400X es mejor que Domane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5?
- Torque del motor60 Nm vs 40 Nm+50 %
- Capacidad de batería400 Wh vs 360 Wh+11 %
- Disco delantero180 mm vs 160 mm+12 %
¿Por qué Domane+ SL 9 AXS Gen 5 es mejor que Nuroad Hybrid C:62 SLX 400X?
- Peso13,3 kg vs 11 kg+21 %
- Gama del grupo (1–5)4/5 vs 5/5+25 %
- Velocidades (atrás)12 vs 13+8 %
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | C:62® Advanced Twin Mold, Gravel Endurance Geometry, Advanced Internal Cable Routing, Flat Mount Disc, Fender/Rack & Kickstand Option, Boost 148, UDH™, Fixed Integrated Battery | 500 Series OCLV Carbon, TQ drive system, tapered head tube, integrated frame bag mounts, flat mount disc, fender mounts, UDH, 142x12mm chamfered thru axle |
| Peso | 13,3 kg | 11 kg |
| Peso máximo total | — | 125 kg |
| Tallas | XS, S, M, L, XL | XS, S, M, ML, L, XL |
| Colores | glintsand´n´black | Matte Deep Smoke, Navy Smoke/Trek White, Serpentine, Mother of Pearl/Silver Marble |
| Año del modelo | 2027 | 2027 |
| Uso | Gravel | Ruta endurance |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Rígida | Rígida |
| Horquilla | CUBE C:62® Technology, 1 1/2" - 1 1/2" Tapered, Flat Mount Disc, Fender & Lowrider Mounts, Internal Light Cable Option, 12x100mm | Domane+ carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, fender mounts, flat mount disc, 12x100mm chamfered thru axle |
| Tija telescópica | No | No |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | GRX 827 Di2 | Red XPLR AXS |
| Marca del grupo | Shimano | SRAM |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | Sí |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 13 |
| Platos | 1 | 1 |
| Rango del casete | 10–51T | 10–46T |
| Desviador trasero | Shimano GRX Di2 RD-RX827-SGS, 12-Speed | SRAM RED XPLR eTap AXS, 46T max cog |
| Mandos de cambio | — | SRAM RED AXS E1 |
| Casete | Shimano XT CS-M8100, 10-51T | SRAM XG-1391, 10-46T, 13 speed |
| Bielas | ACID MTB Hybrid Pro, Newmen Pin, 42T | E*thirteen Piedmont Race Carbon E*spec, 165mm length |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | — |
| Frenos | Shimano GRX BR-RX820, Hydr, Disc Brake, Flat Mount (180/180) | — |
| Disco delantero | 180 mm | 160 mm |
| Disco trasero | 180 mm | 160 mm |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | Conti Terra Adventure, Trail Grip, 45-622 | Bontrager Kwaremont RSL, Tubeless Ready, GR puncture protection, aramid bead, 320 tpi, 700x35mm |
| Ancho de llanta | 45 mm | — |
| Ruedas | Newmen Advanced SL X.R.36 Carbon, 24/24 Spokes, Tubeless Ready | Bontrager Aeolus RSL 37, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 37mm rim depth, 100x12mm thru axle |
| Rines | Carbono | Carbono |
| Tubeless ready | Sí | Sí |
| Sistema eléctrico | ||
| Marca del motor | Bosch | TQ |
| Motor | Bosch Drive Unit Performance SX max. 60Nm (BDU31) | TQ-HPR40, 40 Nm, 200 watt peak power |
| Posición del motor | Motor central | Motor central |
| Torque del motor | 60 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Potencia máxima | — | 200 W |
| Capacidad de batería | 400 Wh | 360 Wh |
| Pantalla / mando | — | TQ color LED display with Bluetooth & ANT+ connectivity |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Luces | — | Sí |
| Tija | Newmen Advanced, Carbon, 27.2mm | Bontrager RSL carbon, 27.2mm, 5mm offset |
| Sillín | ACID Nuance SLT X Carbon | Verse Short Pro, carbon rails, 145mm width |
| Manubrio | Newmen Advanced Gravel Bar 318, Carbon, 31.8mm | Bontrager Pro Riser, carbon, 20mm rise, 31.8, 70mm reach, 40cm width |
| Potencia | CUBE CIS Stem +/- 6°, FPI-Link | Trek RCS Pro, -7 degree, 100mm length |
| Pedales | ACID PP Trekking | — |
