- bikeexchange.com.co
- Comparar
- NINETY-SIX 6000 vs Gambler RC Carbon
Merida NINETY-SIX 6000 vs Scott Gambler RC Carbon
En qué gana NINETY-SIX 6000 (1) y dónde se impone Gambler RC Carbon (1) — todas las características lado a lado.
vs
¿Por qué NINETY-SIX 6000 es mejor que Gambler RC Carbon?
- Velocidades (atrás)12 vs 7+71 %
¿Por qué Gambler RC Carbon es mejor que NINETY-SIX 6000?
- Recorrido delantero120 mm vs 200 mm+67 %
Características
Lado a lado
| Marco y talla | ||
| Material del marco | Carbono | Carbono |
| Marco | NINETY-SIX CF4 III, 100mm suspension travel, material: carbon, 29x2.35" max. wheelsize, 148x12mm axle standard, BSA bottom bracket standard | Carbon |
| Forma del marco | — | Diamante |
| Peso | — | 16,8 kg |
| Tallas | S, M, L, XL | — |
| Colores | Silk Steel Blue (Silver) | — |
| Año del modelo | — | 2026 |
| Uso | Cross-country | — |
| Suspensión | ||
| Suspensión | Doble suspensión | Doble suspensión |
| Horquilla | Rock Shox Reba Gold, Air, 120mm suspension travel, Tapered, 3 position remote lockout, 44 mm fork offset, 29x2.6" max. wheelsize | FOX 40 Factory Grip X2 Air |
| Recorrido delantero | 120 mm | 200 mm |
| Amortiguador trasero | Rock SIDluxe Select+, 3 position remote lockout | Fox DHX2 Factory |
| Recorrido trasero | 100 mm | — |
| Tija telescópica | No | — |
| Transmisión | ||
| Grupo | Eagle 70 Transmission | — |
| Marca del grupo | SRAM | — |
| Gama del grupo (1–5) | 3/5 | — |
| Cambios electrónicos | Sí | — |
| Sistema de cambios | — | Desviador |
| Velocidades (atrás) | 12 | 7 |
| Platos | 1 | — |
| Rango del casete | 11–52T | — |
| Desviador trasero | Sram Eagle 70 Transmission, T-Type, 12 speed | SRAM XO1 |
| Mandos de cambio | JD-FL lever / Sram Eagle 70 Transmission | — |
| Casete | Sram XS-1270 Eagle Transmission, 11-52T, 12 speed | — |
| Bielas | Sram Eagle 70 Transmission, 32T, 170 mm for all sizes | — |
| Frenos | ||
| Tipo de freno | Disco hidráulico | Disco hidráulico |
| Frenos | Sram DB8 stealth, 4 piston, hydraulic | SRAM Maven hydraulic disc |
| Disco delantero | 180 mm | — |
| Disco trasero | 180 mm | — |
| Ruedas y llantas | ||
| Tamaño de rueda | 29″ / 28″ (700c) | 29″ / 28″ (700c) |
| Llantas (neumáticos) | Maxxis Rekon Race, 29x2.4" WT, tubeless ready, 3C MaxxTerra EXO | — |
| Ancho de llanta | 61 mm | — |
| Ruedas | Novatec SL-Team D041SB-B15 / Novatec SL-Team D952RSB, 110x15mm width front hub, 32 spoke holes, 6 bolt, 148x12mm width rear hub, DT Swiss ratchet compatible, 32 | Race Face Atlas |
| Rines | Aluminio | — |
| Tubeless ready | Sí | — |
| Equipamiento y componentes | ||
| Tija | MERIDA TEAM TR SL, 30.9mm diameter, 0mm setback, 150mm travel seatpost | — |
| Sillín | MERIDA COMP SL, 25% recycled material, V-mount | — |
| Manubrio | MERIDA EXPERT CC, material: aluminium, 760mm width, flat | — |
| Potencia | MERIDA TEAM CC III, material: aluminium, 31.8mm diameter, -6° stem angle, S/M:60 mm, L/XL:70 mm | — |
Comparativas relacionadas
vs
Specialized Stumpjumper 15 AlloyvsMerida NINETY-SIX 6000
vs
Specialized ENDURO COMPvsMerida NINETY-SIX 6000
vs
Lapierre XR 5.9vsMerida NINETY-SIX 6000
4,23,7
vs
Specialized STUMPJUMPER 15vsMerida NINETY-SIX 6000
3,63,7
vs
Merida NINETY-SIX 6000vsMondraker Raze Black-Dirty White Ed. 1
3,73,9
vs
Merida NINETY-SIX 6000vsSpecialized Stumpjumper 15 Fox Coil Alloy Brushed/Liquid